<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 中华九大州</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2009/11/20/%e4%b8%ad%e5%8d%8e%e4%b9%9d%e5%a4%a7%e5%b7%9e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2009/11/20/%e4%b8%ad%e5%8d%8e%e4%b9%9d%e5%a4%a7%e5%b7%9e/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stillgoingnative &#187; shanghai metro 2020</title>
		<link>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2009/11/20/%e4%b8%ad%e5%8d%8e%e4%b9%9d%e5%a4%a7%e5%b7%9e/comment-page-1/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>stillgoingnative &#187; shanghai metro 2020</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillgoingnative.com/?p=2683#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>[...] romanizations for several place names (Lohkatsy, Zaanhai) rather than a standard Mandarin Pinyin. Linguistic regionalism is supported by design firms? Some might respond that an expanded metro system is wishful thinking. Nonsense &#8211; more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] romanizations for several place names (Lohkatsy, Zaanhai) rather than a standard Mandarin Pinyin. Linguistic regionalism is supported by design firms? Some might respond that an expanded metro system is wishful thinking. Nonsense &#8211; more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2009/11/20/%e4%b8%ad%e5%8d%8e%e4%b9%9d%e5%a4%a7%e5%b7%9e/comment-page-1/#comment-2362</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillgoingnative.com/?p=2683#comment-2362</guid>
		<description>Interesting post! I like the maps. When I was in 随州, people told me that they can&#039;t understand 武汉话, and there was a guy attending the wedding who was from the northeast who said that he basically can&#039;t understand a word of 随州话... and that&#039;s languages that are all supposed to be dialects of Mandarin. 

I wonder if maybe having one official language that everyone has to learn (i.e. 普通话) allows for greater diversity in local languages. In Europe for examples, there are maybe 20 or so different languages that each have official status in a region that&#039;s more or less the size of a Chinese province, so everyone in that region learns a fairly uniform version of that language and can communicate with other people from that region (Swedes from southern Sweden have no problem understanding Swedes from northern Sweden, even though the geographic distance between them is pretty big). In China, the regional language generally isn&#039;t taught in schools or spoken on TV, but it&#039;s still firmly enough rooted to be people&#039;s first language, so then there&#039;s more splintering, and each town speaks their own version -- to the point where two cities in Hubei province apparently can&#039;t understand each others&#039; dialects. Maybe if there had instead been something like a nine-language policy, the versions of those nine language that people speak would have been much more uniform?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post! I like the maps. When I was in 随州, people told me that they can&#8217;t understand 武汉话, and there was a guy attending the wedding who was from the northeast who said that he basically can&#8217;t understand a word of 随州话&#8230; and that&#8217;s languages that are all supposed to be dialects of Mandarin. </p>
<p>I wonder if maybe having one official language that everyone has to learn (i.e. 普通话) allows for greater diversity in local languages. In Europe for examples, there are maybe 20 or so different languages that each have official status in a region that&#8217;s more or less the size of a Chinese province, so everyone in that region learns a fairly uniform version of that language and can communicate with other people from that region (Swedes from southern Sweden have no problem understanding Swedes from northern Sweden, even though the geographic distance between them is pretty big). In China, the regional language generally isn&#8217;t taught in schools or spoken on TV, but it&#8217;s still firmly enough rooted to be people&#8217;s first language, so then there&#8217;s more splintering, and each town speaks their own version &#8212; to the point where two cities in Hubei province apparently can&#8217;t understand each others&#8217; dialects. Maybe if there had instead been something like a nine-language policy, the versions of those nine language that people speak would have been much more uniform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

