<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stillgoingnative &#187; information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stillgoingnative.com/category/information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stillgoingnative.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:57:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>全世界人民团结起来打倒一切反动派！</title>
		<link>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2010/01/16/%e5%85%a8%e4%b8%96%e7%95%8c%e4%ba%ba%e6%b0%91%e5%9b%a2%e7%bb%93%e8%b5%b7%e6%9d%a5%e6%89%93%e5%80%92%e4%b8%80%e5%88%87%e5%8f%8d%e5%8a%a8%e6%b4%be%ef%bc%81/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2010/01/16/%e5%85%a8%e4%b8%96%e7%95%8c%e4%ba%ba%e6%b0%91%e5%9b%a2%e7%bb%93%e8%b5%b7%e6%9d%a5%e6%89%93%e5%80%92%e4%b8%80%e5%88%87%e5%8f%8d%e5%8a%a8%e6%b4%be%ef%bc%81/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillgoingnative.com/?p=3090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s difficult to digest everything that&#8217;s going on right now, particularly for someone who views nearly every event and personal interaction through a game theoretic Machiavellian lens. More information is required. So, brain dump. The relative silence of the Chinese government, rapid involvement of official organs of the U.S. government, and brazen tone of the original [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s difficult to digest everything that&#8217;s going on right now, particularly for someone who views nearly every event and personal interaction through a game theoretic Machiavellian lens. More information is required. So, brain dump. The relative silence of the Chinese government, <a href="http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135105.htm">rapid involvement of official organs of the U.S. government</a>, and brazen tone of the original post seems to point to <a href="http://chinayouren.com/en/2010/01/14/2743?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=email">more damaging information about the attacks that has yet to be revealed</a>. The downside risks of a nation-nation standoff on this issue seem to be much more significant than any possible gains. These U.S. state organs are run by intelligent people and wouldn&#8217;t become involved if there wasn&#8217;t something more serious than what&#8217;s already been publicized; potentially as yet unrevealed egregious details of the espionage that was conducted.</p>
<p>Consider also: Google is certainly not failing in China, and the notion is an exceptionally stupid explanation that plays directly into the simpering / entirely ignorant posture that multinationals seem to adopt when they consider the China market. The move may not be as costly as a lot of people seem to be suggesting. For the foreseeable future, China isn&#8217;t going to account for a large segment of the online ad market. In a decade that will change, though in ten years Google might develop a pseudo-intelligent-do-everything algorithm. The tables won&#8217;t turn but neither China nor IT broadly will develop in a vacuum. Significant changes could still occur.</p>
<p>This is a paradigm shift, regardless of what information we haven&#8217;t heard yet. A decade ago, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprawl_trilogy">inevitable future <em>plutocracy</em> was supposed to oppress my rights and take advantage of people</a>; yet here is a multinational doing what no nation state has been willing to do: take a decidedly scorched earth stance against the CCP. From <a href="http://ultimibarbarorum.com/2010/01/13/google-scientist/">Ultimi Barbarorum</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I was surprised that several Shanghai-based European VCs and businessmen I follow on Twitter were among the cynics, berating Google for not conforming to Chinese/Asian business practices based on saving face, consensus and relationship-building, instead reverting to an “American” ultimatum. But these views come from individuals who have already made their peace with China’s political system, and whose business models and reputation do not depend on the unfettered flow of information. Perhaps some of them are unwittingly using the occasion to signal their own reliability as partners in China: “Look at us — we’d never consider doing what Google just did.” Google may have burned its financial bridges, but they are burning their moral bridges, making them the <a href="http://ultimibarbarorum.com/about/">Stupid Cartesians</a> of this sorry episode, Baruch.</p></blockquote>
<p>Other good readings <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/01/china_and_google_what_we_know.php">here (Fallows)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; What happens after Google is so roundly cheered for taking so clear a stand? China will still be there; many of its people will hunger for outside information and most will aspire to modernization&#8230; The next step is to find some way to reduce the number of losses &#8212; including, yes, for the Chinese government, since (believe me) absolutely no good will come to anyone anywhere from the government&#8217;s feeling shamed, humiliated, or newly insecure. It is emotionally satisfying to see the Chinese government thrown off balance after its recent repressive moves. That won&#8217;t make things better for most people in China.</p></blockquote>
<p>and here <a href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2010/01/jay-ogilvy-the-significance-of-googles-withdrawal-from-china/">(Jay Ogilvy, via China Digital Times)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2010/01/16/%e5%85%a8%e4%b8%96%e7%95%8c%e4%ba%ba%e6%b0%91%e5%9b%a2%e7%bb%93%e8%b5%b7%e6%9d%a5%e6%89%93%e5%80%92%e4%b8%80%e5%88%87%e5%8f%8d%e5%8a%a8%e6%b4%be%ef%bc%81/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>cracks in the wall ?</title>
		<link>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2008/11/08/cracks-in-the-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2008/11/08/cracks-in-the-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 02:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great firewall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stillgoingnative.com/?p=1010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I no longer need to use a proxy server to access most blogs? Very interesting. China was lauded for freeing internet traffic in the wake of the Sichuan earthquake; but it was supposed to be temporary. Both the English and Chinese versions of Wikipedia are accessible, and have been for some time. Is this an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I no longer need to use a proxy server to access most blogs? Very interesting. China was lauded for freeing internet traffic in the wake of the Sichuan earthquake; but it was supposed to be temporary. Both the English and <a href="http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=首页&amp;variant=zh-tw">Chinese versions</a> of Wikipedia are accessible, and have been for some time. Is this an anomaly, or part of a more permanent policy change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stillgoingnative.com/2008/11/08/cracks-in-the-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

