Tony’s update on his research has reminded me that I had originally intended my blogs to be about my research. What an idea. I’ve completed one land restitution case study, which is the Makuleke claim in Kruger National Park. Right now I’m finishing up a draft of a similar land restitution case north of Durban. I’m more excited about this second case because I’m trying to address what restitution really means, what expectations exist, and what it can accomplish. The ANC has promoted land reform as a poverty alleviation tool, but restitution (the idea of “making things right” by addressing individual instances of dispossion under apartheid) is different from redistribution and land tenure reform. Former Land Claims Commissioner, Cherryl Walker, has written about these questions and cautioned that land restitution should not be evaluated simply by the amount of land transferred, but by how the community is able to use the land, and hopefully, benefit from it. I agree with her analysis, and I think the difficult part is that government can’t ensure that communities are “uplifted” by the restitution. If a community is awarded 10,000 hectares of land in a rural area, semi-arid climate, where are community members supposed to work? In what town? Farming is difficult, particularly small scale farming for market. What about water? Transporting crops? After this land restitution case, I’m starting work on land tenure issues in Jo’burg as part of an FMF study.
